{"id":1159,"date":"2026-04-30T12:09:58","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T06:39:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/krishiparva.in\/?p=1159"},"modified":"2026-04-30T12:09:59","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T06:39:59","slug":"india-risks-being-left-behind-in-global-economic-restructuring-experts-warn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/krishiparva.in\/index.php\/2026\/04\/30\/india-risks-being-left-behind-in-global-economic-restructuring-experts-warn\/","title":{"rendered":"India Risks Being Left Behind in Global Economic Restructuring, Experts Warn"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n\n\n\n

Special Report \u00b7 CASMB\u2013YASHADA Forum<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As China consolidates manufacturing supremacy, structural weaknesses and policy paralysis threaten to turn India’s demographic dividend into a liability<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Vijay Gaikwad | Founder-Editor, Krishi Parva  \u00b7  Director \u2014 Trade & Investment, CASMB<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Pune  \u00b7  April 30, 2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Nanasaheb
Nanasaheb Patil, IAS (Retd.),<\/strong> former Additional Chief Secretary, Maharashtra Government, addresses participants at the CASMB Knowledge, Awareness and Brainstorming Programme at YASHADA, Pune. Drawing on decades of administrative and policy experience, his presentation prompted senior officials and industry leaders to reflect critically on India’s economic preparedness. | YASHADA, Pune, April 29, 2026.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

India faces the serious risk of becoming a passive spectator in the most consequential restructuring of the global economic order since World War II, senior economists and policymakers warned at a high-level knowledge forum organised by the Chamber for Advancement of Small and Medium Businesses (CASMB) in Pune on Wednesday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Knowledge, Awareness and Brainstorming Programme, held at MDC Hall No. 3, YASHADA (Yashwantrao Chavan Development Administration Academy), Baner Road, Pune, featured an address by Nanasaheb Patil, IAS (Retd.),<\/strong> former Additional Chief Secretary of the Maharashtra Government and a distinguished agricultural policy expert. His remarks drew a pointed assessment of India’s trajectory at a moment when global trade and manufacturing are being rapidly reordered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China’s Economic Dominance \u2014 Key Indicators (2025)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Total Exports$3.776 Trillion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Share of Global Exports~15.8%<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trade Surplus (Record)$712 Billion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

India GDP (World Rank #4)$4.5 Trillion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

India’s Net FDI InflowNear Zero<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Indian Mfg. Worker Avg. EducationGrade 8<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China’s Strategic Chokehold<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\"Full<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A full house at MDC Hall No. 3, YASHADA<\/strong> \u2014 participants follow a detailed data presentation on China’s subsidy strategies and global trade dynamics, part of the CASMB Knowledge, Awareness and Brainstorming Programme. | YASHADA, Pune, April 29, 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The forum’s central concern was a largely underreported but consequential move by Beijing. In October 2025, President Xi Jinping announced mandatory export licensing requirements for a range of strategic materials \u2014 including rare earth elements, battery components, advanced chemicals, and semiconductor precursors. The implications, analysts noted, were unambiguous: China now possesses the structural leverage to disrupt entire industries across the United States, Europe, Japan, and South Korea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

China’s total exports reached approximately $3.776 trillion in 2025 \u2014 representing nearly 15.8% of global export volume \u2014 while its trade surplus hit a record $712 billion, the highest ever recorded by a single economy. Across critical sectors including solar panels, electric vehicles, steel, aluminium, shipbuilding, and industrial chemicals, China’s installed production capacity meets or exceeds total global demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Management strategist Ram Charan’s so-called “90% Model” describes this approach with precision: systematically build industrial capacity to fulfil 90% of global demand in a chosen sector, depress prices through subsidised exports to eliminate competition, then pivot to the next sector. The model has already effectively dismantled American manufacturing in furniture, textiles, toys, electronics, solar panels, and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) production. Electric vehicles, robotics, aerospace, and artificial intelligence are identified as the next wave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

India’s Structural Vulnerabilities<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\"Senior<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senior government officials, policy analysts, industry leaders, and trade representatives<\/strong> follow the proceedings at the CASMB knowledge dialogue session at YASHADA, Pune. | April 29, 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Against this backdrop, India \u2014 widely projected as China’s foremost emerging rival and a future global manufacturing hub \u2014 finds itself in a precarious position, experts cautioned. India’s GDP stands at approximately $4.5 trillion, making it the world’s fourth-largest economy. Yet that headline figure obscures deep structural deficiencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The country’s 1991 import liberalisation, while broadly reformist, lowered tariffs on finished goods alongside industrial inputs \u2014 inadvertently triggering domestic deindustrialisation at the very moment China was mandating technology transfers and aggressively scaling export capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The forum highlighted three persistent weaknesses. First, the scale deficit<\/strong>: over 60% of Indian manufacturing enterprises employ fewer than nine workers, limiting cost efficiency and competitiveness. Second, an investment gap<\/strong>: net foreign direct investment into India currently stands close to zero, with firms exiting China preferring Vietnam, Thailand, and Mexico. Third, a human capital shortfall<\/strong>: the average Indian manufacturing worker has an eighth-grade education, compared to the junior-college equivalent in China and Vietnam; female workforce participation in Indian industry remains critically low.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Harvard economist Ricardo Hausmann has previously identified India’s limited economic diversification as a core vulnerability \u2014 a concern that the CASMB forum found has only deepened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Divided Counsel, Unified Alarm<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\"Nanasaheb<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nanasaheb Patil, IAS (Retd.),<\/strong> engages in an open and thoughtful exchange with participants following his address at the CASMB programme, YASHADA, Pune. His analysis of India’s role in the ongoing restructuring of the global economy drew significant engagement from the audience. | YASHADA, Pune, April 29, 2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

India’s leading economists remain divided on the remedy. Former RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan<\/strong> has argued that India should pivot decisively toward services \u2014 IT, banking, and digital healthcare \u2014 rather than pursue a manufacturing-led growth model. Former Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramanian,<\/strong> who coined the “New China Shock” framework, has documented how China’s excess manufacturing capacity is now hollowing out not just Western economies but also developing nations like India. Former NITI Aayog Vice-Chairman Arvind Panagariya<\/strong> had recommended Chinese-style coastal Special Economic Zones \u2014 a proposal that was never implemented.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every morning the cabinet boards the bus, debates for hours about which village to travel to, and by evening the driver announces it is too late to travel. The bus has not moved at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Six-Point Reform Agenda<\/h2>\n\n\n\n